Vascular and Immune Cell Disease Mechanisms in Neurological Disease

Post by Lila Metko

The takeaway

There is a link between cerebrovascular dysfunction (i.e., dysfunction in the blood vessels of the brain) and neurological diseases, yet how genetic variants in cerebrovascular cells influence the risk of disease is unknown. The authors developed a novel technology called MultiVINE-seq to understand how gene variants influence disease, and found distinct mechanisms associated with both cerebrovascular and neurological disease.

What's the science?

Over 90% of disease-associated genetic variants reside in non-coding regions of our genetic material. It is estimated that these disease-associated variants are active in a cell-specific manner. There is a clear relationship between cerebrovascular pathology and neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s disease; however, the genetic associations underlying these pathologies remain unclear. Currently, most of our knowledge on these genetic variants that influence disease risk is from investigating non-vascular cell types, due to the difficulty in recovering genetic material from vascular cell nuclei. This week in Neuron, Reid and colleagues developed a method for obtaining high-quality genomic data in vascular cells and integrated it with GWAS data to better understand how these genetic variants influence neurodegenerative disease mechanisms. 

How did they do it?

The authors processed prefrontal cortex samples from 30 post-mortem human brains. The samples were from individuals with conditions ranging from no cognitive impairment to dementia. The MultiVINE-seq processing required collagenase III, an enzyme that specifically digests collagen fibers, and loose-fit homogenization, a type of homogenization that reduces mechanical stress. From their output of genetic material, they determined which variants were in active regulatory elements by finding out which ones were in accessible chromatin regions, and overlapping snATAC-sequence data (which measures chromatin accessibility) with GWAS data. They correlated this information with pre-mRNA transcripts to determine which gene’s expression levels were most likely regulated by the variant-containing regulatory element. Finally, they grouped the genes for which variants likely affected each category of disease to see if there were any commonalities between genes in the same disease group. 

What did they find?

Variants associated with vascular diseases, such as stroke and aneurysm, were strongly associated with disruptions in extracellular matrix genes, which are responsible for the structural integrity of blood vessels in the brain. Thus, the vascular variants may contribute to a deterioration of the structural integrity of blood vessels, leading to leakage in the brain. Variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease were associated with proteins involved in the activation of immune cells and immune system signaling molecules. One Alzheimer’s Disease variant was specifically associated with regulating a protein, PDK2B, that is involved in the activation of T cells. T cells are a type of immune cell that destroys cells that contain pathogenic or foreign material. Further experiments showed that PDK2B and T cells were found near β-amyloid plaques. This suggests that this disease variant may weaken the brain’s immune response and ability to clear protein fragments, such as the material that builds up, forming amyloid plaques in the brain’s of people with Alzheimer’s disease.

What's the impact?

This study is the first to provide insight intot how disease-related non-coding variants in vascular and immune cells may contribute to neurodegenerative disease pathology. This is important because many neurological diseases are associated with deficits in neural vasculature or immune dysfunction. Having this information can equip scientists to better develop biomarkers or treatments for these disorders. 

Access the original scientific publication here.

Does Education Slow Cognitive Aging?

Post by Natalia Ladyka-Wojcik

The takeaway

Previous studies examining the link between education and cognitive decline in aging have yielded mixed results, often relying on small or single-country samples. In this large, multi-national cohort study, researchers found that higher education was associated with better memory performance and greater brain volume, but it did not protect against age-related neurodegeneration.

What's the science?

The relationship between higher education and cognitive function in aging remains a subject of debate. Although a substantial body of evidence has identified education as a major protective factor against age-related dementia in later life, the underlying mechanisms of this are unclear. Two prominent theories – the brain maintenance and cognitive reserve accounts – suggest that education can slow or postpone age-related cognitive decline. However, emerging longitudinal data challenge this view, showing that more educated individuals do not necessarily experience reduced cognitive decline over time. Instead, an alternative hypothesis posits that higher education provides an early-life cognitive advantage that persists into old age, without altering the trajectory of decline. This week in Nature Medicine, Fjell and colleagues examined a large, multi-national longitudinal dataset of memory performance and brain imaging to test whether education offers protection against cognitive aging.

How did they do it?

Addressing the relationship between education and cognitive aging requires large, diverse, and longitudinal datasets with sufficient statistical power. To test competing theories, the authors analyzed longitudinal memory scores in 170,795 participants over the age of 50, along with over 15,000 brain MRI scans from 6,472 participants across 33 Western countries. These data were drawn from large, population-based sources, including the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), which provided repeated measures of verbal episodic memory – a form of memory for specific events in time and space that is particularly sensitive to aging. The researchers also examined neuroimaging markers of cognitive decline, including intracranial brain volume and volume of memory-related brain regions such as the hippocampus and thalamus. To broaden the generalizability of their findings beyond WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) populations, they replicated their memory findings in an independent cohort from China, India, Mexico, and South Africa.

What did they find?

The researchers found that memory scores declined with age, consistent with expected age-related declines in episodic memory. Specifically, across the datasets analyzed, they observed a general pattern of higher memory scores among individuals with more education at all ages. Importantly, however, they found no evidence that higher education reduced memory decline or influenced repeated measures over time. To assess whether these results were specific to verbal memory, the authors extended their analysis to include tests of mathematical ability and temporospatial orientation within the SHARE cohort. For brain-based markers of aging, higher education was associated with greater intracranial volume and slightly larger volumes in memory-sensitive regions. However, the rate of decline in these brain regions was similar regardless of education level.

What's the impact?

This study is the first to show, using large-scale longitudinal data, that the commonly held view of education as a protective factor against cognitive aging lacks strong support. Instead, individuals with more years of formal education tend to begin adulthood with higher cognitive functioning, but they do not experience slower cognitive decline as they age.

Access the original scientific publication here.

Can The Menstrual Cycle Impact Memory Processing?

Post by Rebecca Glisson

The takeaway

Hormones such as estradiol, the primary female reproductive hormone, can alter the number of inputs a brain cell receives from within the hippocampus, the memory center of the brain. When estradiol levels are highest during an estrous cycle (the mouse menstrual cycle), these brain cells have the most connections to other cells within the hippocampus, suggesting that higher estradiol is related to better learning and memory function.

What's the science?

Cells in the brain communicate with each other when a synapse (the end of one neuron) sends signals to a dendritic spine (the beginning of another neuron). The more dendritic spines there are on one neuron, the more inputs it receives and the more communication it has in turn with other neurons. This week in Neuron, Wolcott and colleagues explored whether the fluctuations of estradiol during the estrous cycle in female mice affect the density of dendritic spines within the hippocampus.

How did they do it?

To study the spine density of neurons in the hippocampus, the authors used a specialized microscope in combination with two-photon imaging, or used fluorescence to look specifically at the dendritic spines of cells. They first measured the concentration of estradiol in females in order to track each stage of the estrous cycle, which lasts 4-5 days in mice and has four different stages, similar to the human menstrual cycle. Estradiol is most concentrated just before ovulation in both humans and mice, which occurs during the proestrus stage in mice. In order to measure changes in the dendrites of neurons, the authors implanted a permanent glass microperiscope in the brain, since the hippocampus is found deep within the brain and is typically difficult to look at in live mice. They used mice that were genetically bred to have fluorescent cells in this area of the brain so that they could track changes in the dendrites of these cells. When new dendritic spines formed, the authors also tracked whether these spines were lost quickly afterwards or remained as a new, lasting part of the cell.

What did they find?

Female mice had the highest density of dendritic spines when they were in the proestrus cycle, when estradiol concentrations were highest. This suggests that estradiol affects the structure of neurons and that higher concentrations of estradiol lead to more connections between cells in the hippocampus. The authors also found that, while many of the new spines that were added in the proestrus stage were shortly lost afterwards, a portion of these new spines remained present on the cells as a permanent addition. This demonstrated that estradiol can permanently change the structure of and connectivity between cells in this part of the brain.

What's the impact?

This study is the first to show that the estrous cycle in mice is related to the structure and function of hippocampal neurons. It suggests that learning and memory processing within the brain are influenced by the changes in hormone levels during the estrous cycle. However, females are not necessarily more variable than males due to their estrous cycles. For example, hormones also change throughout the day based on the sleep/wake circadian cycle, which occurs in both males and females. Studies like this can help us better understand how our learning and memory functions can change based on our hormones.

Access the original scientific publication here.